If you’re worried about overstressing your system’s processor or simply just want to use a streaming software that’s more minimalistic with fewer bells and whistles, then OBS is definitely the better option.Īnother big difference between OBS and Streamlabs is how users can use and access overlays. Whereas Streamlabs’ features all function within the application itself, OBS’s software itself doesn’t house any of the plugins which means the program itself has relatively low CPU usage. While users who want to take full advantage of OBS will need to utilize third party plug-ins which can take a bit of additional fenangling in order to properly setup, the positive side of this is the lower performance hit on one’s computer. OBS has fewer features built into it, but this can be seen as both a drawback and a benefit. It’s again worth noting that many of Streamlabs’ additional features are locked behind a paywall, but paying for their subscription isn’t fully necessary in order to enjoy the software’s various quality-of-life improvements that it has over OBS. If you happen to own a beefy rig and money isn’t an issue, then we would probably recommend using Streamlabs.īut if you happen to own a beefy rig and money isn’t an issue, then we would recommend using Streamlabs. Quite frankly, live streaming while playing a graphically demanding AAA game is very taxing on one’s system by itself – if your PC lacks high-end parts, then running Streamlabs might mean fewer FPS and a worse overall gaming experience while streaming. But because of all of the additional features, the program is also significantly more taxing on one’s CPU. Streamlabs is arguably the more user-friendly streaming software available, with tons of great built-in features and tools available right out-of-the-box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |